Research on research: systematic reviews for retinal and vitreous conditions are classified as not reliable

Researchers at the Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, have reported that systematic reviews for retinal and vitreous conditions were deemed to be “as not reliable”.  Just under 60% of systematic reviews were judged to be inadequate and a primary concern indicates that there is a lack of a comprehensive literature search to support the required evidence-base.  The research report, published at JAMA Ophthalmology (Oct. 10, 2019), comments that there is a failure to conduct a comprehensive search, leading to an omission of a potentially large proportion of studies and this may impoverish the quality of data for patients.


According to the study, 327 systematic reviews of interventions for retina and vitreous

conditions were assessed. Out of these, 131 systematic reviews were classified “as reliable” but 196 systematic reviews were classified “as not reliable based on our criteria”. The most common unmet criterion was the lack of a comprehensive literature search for eligible studies (149 [76.0%]), followed by the lack of a risk of bias assessment of individual studies included in the review. (98 [50.0%]). In age-related macular degeneration, some researchers found that approximately 1 in 4 systematic reviews were not reliable. By way of example, a systematic review team may have searched multiple databases, but did not use a comprehensive search strategy or inappropriately limited results by date and language.  Criteria for reliable systematic reviews regarding a comprehensive literature search includes: “(1) Described an electronic search of ≥2 bibliographic databases, (2) used a search strategy comprising a mixture of controlled vocabulary and keywords, (3) reported using at least 1 other method of searching such as searching of conference abstracts, identified ongoing trials, complemented electronic searching by hand search methods (eg, checking reference lists), and contacted experts or authors of included studies”.  Lacking these steps will miss the necessary evidence-base and this will impact on healthcare.


The 7 conditions targeted for updating in the American Academy of Ophthalmology Retina/Vitreous PPP (Preferred Practice Pattern) include: (i) age-related macular degeneration; (ii) diabetic retinopathy, including diabetic macular edema; (iii) idiopathic epiretinal membrane and vitreomacular traction; (iv) idiopathic macular hole; (v) posterior vitreous detachment, retinal breaks, and lattice degeneration; (vi) retinal and ophthalmic artery occlusions; and (vii) retinal vein occlusions.  If the systematic review process on these 7 conditions is not corrected, there will be wasted resources, money, time and effort from research across the global community.  Most of all, this unreliable effort will ultimately harm patients.

12 thoughts on “Research on research: systematic reviews for retinal and vitreous conditions are classified as not reliable”

  1. I am not positive the place you are getting your information, but great topic.

    I needs to spend a while finding out much more or understanding more.
    Thanks for excellent info I used to be looking for this info for my mission.

  2. I just want to mention I’m beginner to blogs and certainly liked your blog. Most likely I’m want to bookmark your site . You amazingly come with beneficial article content. Regards for sharing your website page.

  3. I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your website. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme? Great work!

  4. Have you ever considered about adding a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is fundamental and everything. However imagine if you added some great pictures or videos to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with pics and video clips, this blog could undeniably be one of the very best in its niche. Very good blog!

  5. I simply wanted to develop a quick note so as to appreciate you for all the nice suggestions you are showing at this website. My particularly long internet research has at the end been honored with brilliant facts and strategies to write about with my friends and family. I would believe that we visitors actually are very lucky to be in a magnificent community with many awesome individuals with useful solutions. I feel rather fortunate to have discovered your web site and look forward to some more fabulous moments reading here. Thank you once more for all the details.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.